Motivating communities to retrofit their homes: The potential of thermal imaging in BC

This report reviews the technique of thermal imaging as a means of revealing heat loss from single family homes, its current applications in Canada and abroad, and the potential of coupling its use with community-based initiatives to improve uptake rates of energy efficiency retrofits and conservation. By allowing homeowners to see the energy loss (via infrared images) that would otherwise be invisible, thermal imaging provides a powerful visual tool that can engage and trigger a deeper understanding of retrofit needs and opportunities, on both personal (residential) and community (neighbourhood or city) levels.

The paper concludes with 30 sector-specific recommendations to support provincial and local governments, utilities, neighbourhood groups, and academic institutions working in partnership to encourage home energy retrofits. These include opportunities to:

  • Encourage the wider use of expert-guided thermal imaging to motivate householders to take action in retrofitting their homes;
  • Provide support (e.g. expertise, communications, policies, etc.) for community leaders and groups interested in leading neighbourhood-scale energy retrofit programs for both single-family homes and multi-unit family buildings;
  • Tie existing incentive programs to the use of thermal imaging technologies and promote a more comprehensive retrofit strategy that can track and support retrofit activities over time;
  • Explore and test innovative funding mechanisms, such as the coordination of bulk purchases of thermal imaging or retrofit supplies, to support community-led thermal imaging initiatives; and
  • Foster continued research to measure the effectiveness and limitations of thermal imaging tools and community-led programs in BC in helping to reduce GHG emissions.

Community Energy Implementation Framework

The Community Energy Implementation Framework is a guide intended to help communities move Community Energy Plans (CEPs) from a vision to implementation.

It includes 10 strategies that provide insights, advice and a proposed path forward to:

  • Foster widespread political, staff and stakeholder support
  • Build staff and financial capacity for implementation
  • Embed energy into the plans, policies and processes of the local government

The Framework will answer questions such as:

  • Who should lead the development and implementation of the CEP?
  • What stakeholder groups should you engage with and when?
  • How can you effectively communicate with various stakeholder groups to ensure meaningful engagement and input?
  • What internal and external resources are available to support CEP implementation?
  • How can local government staff incorporate energy into existing plans and policies?
  • How can staff effectively monitor and report on implementation progress?
  • And more!

Find out more about Getting to Implementation Framework

Methods for Measuring the Economics of Community Energy Plans

The value proposition for Community Energy Plan (CEP) implementation is compelling: opportunities to strengthen local economies, reduce current and future energy costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and create local jobs. The ability to demonstrate this economic potential, through economic analysis, is a critical ingredient for securing the required investment and the political, staff, and stakeholder support for CEP implementation. Economic analysis can also help with developing a CEP that maximizes economic, environmental, and social benefits.

This report introduces six major methods of economic analysis: community energy cost, financial feasibility, levelized unit energy cost, marginal abatement cost curve, community socioeconomic benefits, and cost-benefits. Each method includes advice on consideration in interpretation of results, the need for specialized expertise, the approximate cost and level of effort, and data requirements. Each method is also illustrated with an example drawn from a Canadian CEP analysis.