Some local governments apply DCCs uniformly and do not differentiate between different types of development and their impact on infrastructure. Alternatively, a sector or gradient approach to DCCs sets reduced rates for higher density development and high performance buildings, reflecting the associated reduction in infrastructure costs.
Regional practicalities around DCCs provide an important context for the successful implementation of sector or gradient-based DCCs. However, the effectiveness of DCCs can be compromised if development simply leapfrogs to a neighbouring community with a different DCC standard.
The 2008 amendments to the Local Government Act require local governments, when setting their DCCs, to consider the impact on capital costs of infrastructure of development designed to result in a low environmental impact, plus other specified criteria. DCC bylaws can be integrated with other planning strategies, such as an Official Community Plan.
Land Use Opportunity
DCCs can provide a financial incentive for compact growth. Flat-rate DCCs have been the traditional approach, and can encourage large lots and less compact development. However, by varying DCCs by lot size, size of units or by location, local governments can encourage infill development, contiguous development and compact growth.
By adjusting DCCs for density and location, local governments can provide financial incentive for developers to build at densities and forms that are transit supportive. Also, the costs associated with arterial roads make up 20-40% of the total DCCs in most BC municipalities. DCCs could be significantly reduced if a development is able to reduce vehicle use and, in turn, the amount of arterial road required.
Varying DCCs allows local governments to encourage green buildings (e.g.. LEED certified) and affordable housing developments. Sooke
now offers developers a multiple year DCC reduction for LEED certified and not-for-profit housing. Similarly, Penticton
grants DCC reductions of 50% -100% for eligible green developments.
By adjusting DCCs by location and density, local governments can optimize their infrastructure investments since the true cost of providing infrastructure to new developments is often not reflected in flat rate fees.
Reduce DCCs closer to the town centre where the cost of providing infrastructure is usually much less than at the periphery.
Reduce the DCC per unit for high density development to reflect the efficiency in providing infrastructure to higher density development compared to low density because of the shorter distribution distances.
Eliminate DCCs for subdivision of small lots that are designed to result in low greenhouse gas emissions and development that is designed to result in low environmental impact.
Reduce DCCs in designated areas to encourage development that is able to support transit, a district energy system or a geo-exchange heating system.
 Ministry of Community Development. (2005). Development Cost. http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/finance/development_cost_charges.htm